Huge apologies for my continued absence.
Can you evaluate Dief the Chief's tenure as PM and draw a comparison to Pearson using the following question:
Pearson improved Canadian society (ie, National identity, economy, social etc) more than Diefenbaker. How far do you agree?
Essentially, you'd want to explain what Dief the Chief did for each factor, then explain whether Pearson improved Canada or not. You might want to define what "improved" might mean to each factor. Please email me if confused.
Noah, I will sort out textbook pages on my return. Apologies for my tardiness.